Businesses For Sale have 33 Shoe Repair Businesses for sale . View full business details of any Shoe Repair Business for sale by clicking the business title. If you own a Shoe Repair Business and are considering selling, visit our Sell a Business section.
Refine your business for sale search, Advanced Search
21 - 33 of 33 Shoe Repair Businesses for sale
Age | Business for Sale | Price | Turnover | Profit | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Class Shoe Shop For Sale | £ 80,000 | £ 62,400 | Undisclosed | Somerset, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Leasehold Shoe Repairs Key Cutting For Sale Price Reduced | £ 38,000 | £ 44,000 | Undisclosed | Poole, Dorset, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Ladies Footwear & Millinery | £ 46,000 | £ 66,000 | Undisclosed | Belper, Derbys , UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Shoe Shop | £ 40,000 | £ 93,600 | Undisclosed | Essex, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Alterations & Shoe Repair | $ 69,990 | $ 110,550 | $ 45,930 | Broward County, FL, US | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Shoe Repairs | £ 70,000 | £ 2,600 | Undisclosed | Dorset, Dorset, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| |||||
| Shoe Repairs/Leather Goods & Key Cutting | £ 76,000 | £ 89,000 | Undisclosed | Herts, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Ladies Shoe Shop | £ 29,950 | £ 80,000 | Undisclosed | Lincs , UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Designer Footwear | £ 494,950 | £ 860,833 | Undisclosed | Lancs, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Shoe Repairs/Key Cutting & Retail | £ 28,000 | £ 27,500 | Undisclosed | Leics , UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Footwear & Shoe Repairs | £ 34,950 | £ 100,000 | Undisclosed | Lancs, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Leasehold Shoe Repair Shop Price Reduced | £ 40,000 | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | London, London, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
| Locksmith and Shoe Repairs For Sale Price Reduced | £ 35,000 | Undisclosed | Undisclosed | Wembley, London, UK | |
| Business in: | |||||
21 - 33 of 33 Shoe Repair Businesses for sale
|
If you haven't been brought to the right country version of our site please select the correct one below: