Buy an Industrial Building For Sale business for sale in Sarasota County on BusinessesForSale.com

  • Advert ID: 625566
  • (Seller ref: 74101374)

Industrial Building For Sale


Location:
Category:
Asking price:
$690,000
Sales revenue:
< $500k
Net profit:
< $250k
Business closed / Asset sale:
Yes
Years established:
19

No image available

Real Estate with Metal building. This beautiful building consists of a 2000 sq. ft. tiled showroom, 2000 sq. ft. offices and 9760 sq. ft. of warehouse and fabrication area located on over .33 acre on nearly 20,000 sq. ft. of land. Metal/Stone building was built in 1989 with concrete floor and nice open work area under roof in zone of ILW. (Industrial Light & Warehousing) Seller has moved out but all equipment for marble and granite is still installed and ready to produce great revenue for new buyer. (See listing #7411375)


Support & training:
Will train 1 week at no cost.
Reasons for selling:
Moving out of state for other business.
Trading hours:
8-5 Mon-Fri
Financing available:
$290,000 for 36 months at 7.5% at $9,020.80 per month.

For more information about this business for sale, click the Contact Seller button.

Please only contact this seller if you have a GENUINE interest in buying this business. DO NOT MAKE CONTACT if you wish to sell your third party goods or services as you will be blocked from this site.

selling your business?

If you own a business and are considering selling, visit our Sell Your Business section.


BusinessesForSale.com recommends
  • GET A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THIS BUSINESS
  • Compare price and profitablility to similar businesses
  • Accurately value this business
  • Due dilligence checklist
  • View selling price of similar sold businesses
  • Business Buyer Toolbox
  • Click here to view demo
  • BUSINESS WANTED
  • Reach sellers looking for a business buyer by placing a Business Wanted advert.
  • Business Wanted
  • Business Wanted

Change country Close

If you haven't been brought to the right country version of our site please select the correct one below: