Buy an Easy To Run Dunkin’ Donuts Network business for sale in New York on BusinessesForSale.com

  • Listing ID: 637974
  • (Seller ref: 8022)

Easy To Run Dunkin’ Donuts Network For Sale


Location:
Category:
Type:

Asking price:
$2,900,000 (Furniture / Fixtures included)
Sales revenue:
$2,500,000
Cash flow:
$400,000
Franchise opportunity:
Yes

No image available

Well positioned small Dunkin’ Donuts network with fully operational kitchen and conveniently located satellite stores are for sale. All stores are located in high traffic areas, including some very busy supermarket shopping centers. Some of the Dunkin’ Donuts stores have an outside service window which assists in the ease of the operation as well as the ability to increase revenue. This is a unique opportunity for someone new to join one of the leading franchise systems in the world, or for an existing Dunkin’ franchisee to add to their current network. Please refer to listing number 8022 when calling about this opportunity


Location:
3 Locations in high traffic areas

Furniture / Fixtures value:
$900,000 (included in the asking price)
Inventory / Stock value:
$15,000

For more information about this business for sale, click the Contact Seller button.


Please only contact this seller if you have a GENUINE interest in buying this business. DO NOT MAKE CONTACT if you wish to sell your third party goods or services as you will be blocked from this site.

selling your business?

If you own a business and are considering selling, visit our Sell a Coffee Shop section.


BusinessesForSale.com recommends
  • HOW TO BUY A GOOD BUSINESS AT A GREAT PRICE
  • 100s of strategies & techniques to help you find & buy the right business.
  • Buy a good business for a great price
  • Click here for more

  • BUSINESS WANTED
  • Reach sellers looking for a business buyer by placing a Business Wanted advert.
  • Business Wanted
  • Business Wanted

Advertisement


Change country Close

If you haven't been brought to the right country version of our site please select the correct one below: