Buy a Chateau For Sale Near Poitiers France business for sale in Antigny on BusinessesForSale.com

  • Listing ID: 895282

Chateau For Sale Near Poitiers France For Sale


Location:
Category:
Type:

Asking price:
€2,700,000
Sales revenue:
Available on request
Cash flow:
Available on request

The wing facing the park


XIV Century Manoir in Poitiers region

Chateau in the charming ancient village of Antigny, in the region Poitou Charentes, just South of the Loire and 30km from Poitiers (TGV to Paris 1h5min, airport with flights to all France, London and Edinburgh)

Most impressive restoration. Main building comprising 8 bedrooms with bathrooms, large halls, soundproofed music room. Vast outbuildings around a square courtyard: caretaker’s house, summer house with guest bedrooms, large heated swimming pool, garage for 6 cars, 1ha park, 20ha wood. Great potential for low-cost conversion to Gites or B&B.


Real Estate:
Real Property Included
Location:
Antigny, Charming french medieval village in the South Loire,

Expansion potential:
the property is 1200 sq m, has garage for 9 cars, parking for 12
Related documents:

For more information about this business for sale, click the Contact Seller button.


Please only contact this seller if you have a GENUINE interest in buying this business. DO NOT MAKE CONTACT if you wish to sell your third party goods or services as you will be blocked from this site.

selling your business?

If you own a business and are considering selling, visit our Sell a Guest House / Bed and Breakfast section.


BusinessesForSale.com recommends
  • HOW TO BUY A GOOD BUSINESS AT A GREAT PRICE
  • 100s of strategies & techniques to help you find & buy the right business.
  • Buy a good business for a great price
  • Click here for more

  • BUSINESS WANTED
  • Reach sellers looking for a business buyer by placing a Business Wanted advert.
  • Business Wanted
  • Business Wanted

Advertisement


Change country Close

If you haven't been brought to the right country version of our site please select the correct one below: